How Often Should You Review Search Term Priorities?
← Back to How to Prioritise Search Terms Using SIS, ROAS and Conversion Rate
Quick answer
Search term priority reviews are typically conducted weekly or bi-weekly. This cadence gives advertisers enough data to spot meaningful shifts in spend, conversion rate, and Search Impression Share without reacting to isolated daily noise. Weekly reviews are useful when competition or seasonality is changing quickly. Bi-weekly reviews can be sufficient when accounts are stable and data volume is lower. The purpose is to catch SIS and ROAS movement early enough to adjust bids or negative keyword decisions before wasted spend accumulates.
There is no universal schedule that works for every Amazon Ads account. The best frequency depends on how quickly your data accumulates, how aggressive your targets are, and how much time you can commit to acting on what you find. The guidance below can help you settle into a rhythm that keeps search term priorities current without creating unnecessary busywork.
Why Weekly or Bi-Weekly Reviews Are the Baseline
Search term performance changes for many reasons: seasonal demand shifts, new competitors entering auctions, or gradual changes in ad placement and search impression share. Reviewing too rarely can allow a term with declining ROAS to continue spending for weeks. Reviewing too often, such as multiple times per day, often leads to overcorrecting based on thin data.
Weekly or bi-weekly checks provide enough statistical relevance for most accounts. They also create a repeatable workflow that makes it easier to compare period-over-period changes in spend, sales, and conversion rate.
Choosing Weekly vs Bi-Weekly for Your Account
A weekly rhythm tends to fit accounts that are spending quickly, testing new keywords, or operating during peak sales periods. More frequent reviews help you catch a sudden drop in SIS or an unexpected ROAS decline before it consumes a large portion of budget.
A bi-weekly rhythm can work when the account is mature, traffic is steady, and historical data shows less volatility. If your reports are consolidated in a dashboard like the Amazon Ads Dashboard by Todoza, even a weekly review becomes lighter because key metrics are already organized for comparison.
- Consider weekly reviews when spend is high, seasonality is active, or you are testing new search terms.
- Consider bi-weekly reviews when performance is stable and you need fewer data points to make decisions.
- Keep a consistent day for each review so that reporting periods stay comparable.
When This Matters: Seasonality and Competitive Pressure
Seasonal events and increased ad competition can compress the normal review window. For example, a search term that performs well in a quiet month may see its ROAS fall sharply during a holiday spike if other advertisers begin bidding more aggressively. A weekly check is often the minimum during these periods.
This is also the time when a structured review helps you separate signal from noise. A daily dip may not require action, but a consistent two-week trend across SIS and ROAS is more actionable. Use that trend to decide whether to lower a bid, add a negative, or let a term continue gathering data.
Related products
Related guides
Your review cadence is not a one-time decision. Revisit it as account spend, product launches, and advertising competition change. Once you have a review rhythm in place, the next step is applying the same SIS, ROAS, and conversion rate lens to rank the search terms that deserve action first. That decision-making process is the heart of prioritizing search terms across your campaigns.