Addressing Team Collaboration in Amazon Ad Reviews
← Back to How to Build a Weekly SIS Review for Sponsored Products
Quick answer
Team collaboration during Amazon Sponsored Products SIS reviews improves when each reviewer has a defined role, uses a shared performance dashboard, and follows a standard way to record decisions. This keeps search term evaluations, negative keyword candidates, and bid adjustment tasks visible across the group. The result is a faster weekly review with fewer missed follow-ups and a clearer trail from analysis to approved action.
Most collaboration problems in SIS reviews come from unclear ownership rather than missing data. When a team agrees on a simple weekly flow—who prepares, who reviews, and who approves—the discussion stays focused on campaign performance instead of process questions.
Assign clear roles before the review starts
A weekly SIS review moves faster when every step has a named owner. Teams often avoid this because the review feels small, but unclear ownership creates delays when multiple people touch the same search term list.
- Preparer: imports the Sponsored Products report and flags terms that are wasting spend or missing targets.
- Reviewer: checks the recommendations against account goals and proposes negative keywords or bid adjustments.
- Approver: confirms final changes before they are applied manually.
This separation also fits tools that require team approval before changes go live, reducing the risk of premature campaign edits.
Use a shared dashboard for one source of truth
Collaborative dashboards remove the confusion of multiple spreadsheets in email threads. They let reviewers look at the same campaign-level metrics and search term performance during the weekly meeting. One option for this is the Amazon Ads Dashboard by Todoza, which consolidates Amazon Ads data and supports drill-down from account to search term level.
When everyone works from the same view, it becomes easier to compare underperforming terms across campaigns and decide which items need cleanup before the next SIS review.
Standardize documentation and decision tracking
A short decision log keeps the team aligned between meetings. For each flagged search term or campaign, record the metric that triggered the review, the recommended action, the owner, and the due date. This can be a simple shared sheet or a PDF snapshot.
- Use one consistent format for negative keyword candidates and bid changes.
- Track whether an item is approved, pending, or rejected.
- Keep the notes objective: spend, clicks, conversions, and target ROAS or ACoS.
This matters most when the review involves multiple people or spans several marketplaces. Without consistent documentation, teams often revisit the same decision or lose track of which change still needs approval.
Related products
Related guides
Teams that treat SIS collaboration as part of the weekly SIS review process tend to catch inefficient search terms earlier and follow through on approved changes more consistently. Small workflow improvements compound into better account-level performance without adding heavy process.